W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > March 2009

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form"

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:25:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090304.162550.31761081.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: schneid@fzi.de
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Dear Michael,

Thank you for your comment
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

Thanks for pointing the divergence between the nomenclature in the OWL 2
Last Call documents and that used previously. We have moved from lexical
value to lexical form to be consistent with OWL 1, XML Schema datatypes,
and RDF.

The diffs for the Syntax, Direct Semantics, RDF-based Semantics and
Conformance can be found at [1], [2], [3] and [4] respectively. 

The working group views this as an editorial change.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
<mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. 

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=18519&oldid=18157

[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Direct_Semantics&diff=18518&oldid=18158

[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=RDF-Based_Semantics&diff=18492&oldid=18491

[4] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Conformance_and_Test_Cases&diff=18578&oldid=18577
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:25:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:29 UTC