public-owl-comments@w3.org from March 2009 by author

Alan Rector

• Comment received and ackowledged (Thursday, 19 March)

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (Wednesday, 11 March)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: [LC response] To Bijan Parsia (Friday, 27 March)

Boris Motik

• RE: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Monday, 30 March)
• RE: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Monday, 23 March)
• [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC response] To Michael Schneider (Monday, 2 March)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Re: [LC Response] To Chimezie Ogbuji Re: Comments for OWL2-RL profile (Friday, 13 March)

Chris Welty

• Re: [LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: non-disjoint value spaces for numeric datatypes (Thursday, 19 March)

Dr Jeremy Rogers

• Re: [LC Response] To Jeremy Rogers (Re: OWL2 annotations) (Tuesday, 17 March)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: General comments on OWL2 design (Friday, 13 March)

Hladik, Jan

• RE: [LC response] To Jan Hladik (Friday, 13 March)

Ian Horrocks

• [LC response] To Frank van Harmelen (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC response] To Frank van Harmelen (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Caroll (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Caroll (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC response] To SWD WG (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 30 March)
• [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Friday, 27 March)
• [LC response] To Marko Luther (Friday, 27 March)
• [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Friday, 27 March)
• [LC Response] To Jonas von Malottki Re: OWL2 (Friday, 27 March)
• [LC response] To Bijan Parsia (Friday, 27 March)
• [LC response] To Tom Morris (Friday, 27 March)
• [LC response] To Marijke Keet (Monday, 23 March)
• OWL Last Call comment (Thursday, 19 March)
• OWL Last Call comment (Thursday, 19 March)
• OWL Last Call comment (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To SWD WG (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Matthew Horridge (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Michael Schneider (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Guus Schreiber (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Frank van Harmelen (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Frank van Harmelen (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 19 March)
• [LC response] To Marko Luther (Monday, 16 March)
• [LC response] To Jan Hladik (Friday, 6 March)
• [LC response] To Kaarel Kaljurand (Friday, 6 March)
• [LC response] To Jos de Bruijn (Friday, 6 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: [LC response] To Ivan Herman- LC comment on OWL 2 QL (Thursday, 26 March)
• [LC Response #2] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 5 March)
• [LC response] To Andrea Splendiani (Thursday, 5 March)

Jan Wielemaker

• Re: [LC Response #2] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Re 2: [LC Response] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 (Monday, 2 March)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: [LC response] To Jeremy Caroll (Monday, 30 March)

Jim Hendler

• Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) (Monday, 23 March)

Jonathan Rees

• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jonathan Rees (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree (Thursday, 5 March)

Jos de Bruijn

• Re: [LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: why restrict the set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL profile? (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Jos de Bruijn (Sunday, 8 March)

Kaarel Kaljurand

• Re: [LC response] To Kaarel Kaljurand (Friday, 6 March)

Marijke Keet

• Re: [LC response] To Marijke Keet (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Marijke Keet Re: haskey clarification (Thursday, 5 March)

Marko Luther

• Re: [LC response] To Marko Luther (Tuesday, 24 March)

Matthew Horridge

• Re: [LC response] To Matthew Horridge (Thursday, 19 March)

Michael Schneider

• [Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics (Friday, 27 March)
• RE: [LC response] To Michael Schneider (Thursday, 19 March)
• RE: [LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: Clarify what it means that the value in a facet-value pair (F v) is an "arbitrary object" (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: [LC response] To Ralf Moeller (Thursday, 5 March)
• RE: [LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form" (Wednesday, 4 March)
• RE: [LC response] To Michael Schneider (Monday, 2 March)

Mike Smith

• Re: [LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Thursday, 5 March)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To M. Scott Marshall Re: OWL2 comments (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: RIF perspective on supported datatypes (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: why restrict the set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL profile? (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: non-disjoint value spaces for numeric datatypes (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To M. Scott Marshall Re: OWL2 comments (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Jonas von Malottki Re: OWL2 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: Clarify what it means that the value in a facet-value pair (F v) is an "arbitrary object" (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Chimezie Ogbuji Re: Comments for OWL2-RL profile (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: General comments on OWL2 design (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Jeremy Rogers (Re: OWL2 annotations) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern (Thursday, 5 March)
• [LC Response] To Chimezie Ogbuji Re: Comments for OWL2-RL profile (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Marijke Keet Re: haskey clarification (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: General comments on OWL2 design (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: RIF perspective on supported datatypes (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form" (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [LC Response] To Jeremy Rogers (Re: OWL2 annotations) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Tom Morris

• Re: [LC response] To Tom Morris (Tuesday, 31 March)

Uli Sattler

• [LC response] To Ivan Herman- LC comment on OWL 2 QL (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [LC response] To Roman Kontchakov & Michael Zakharyaschev- LC comment on OWL 2 QL (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [LC response] To Maurizio Lenzerini, Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Riccardo Rosati - LC comment on OWL 2 QL (Wednesday, 25 March)

Wolfgang Orthuber

• patterns for searchable representation of quantifiable objects (Monday, 30 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 23:15:14 UTC