- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
- Cc: r.f.moeller@tu-harburg.de
[Forwarded, as usual.] From: Ralf Moeller <r.f.moeller@tu-harburg.de> Subject: Re: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:13:48 +0200 > Dear Peter, > > I received you comments. Too bad we cannot get out old rats. > > Best regards, > > Ralf > > On Mar 18, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> Dear Ralf: >> >> This message is in reply to your comment available as >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0059.html>, >> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts; the initial >> response from the working group >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0031.html>; >> and your subsequent reply, available as >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Mar/0018.html> >> >> The Working Group acknowledges that multi-valued data properties >> together with datatype facets do pose an implementation burden. However, >> the group is not chartered [1] to do any changes that would break >> backward compatibility with OWL 1, which had numerous implementations >> with non-functional datatypes, as well as deployment of ontologies >> possibly relying on that feature. Note also that no erratum was reported >> on this feature on OWL 1 [2]. Therefore, the Working Group does not >> intend to change OWL 2 in this way. >> >> Regards, >> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/errata >
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 17:16:07 UTC