W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [LC response] To Marijke Keet

From: Marijke Keet <keet@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:42:40 +0100
Message-ID: <49CB8650.8050006@inf.unibz.it>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Dear Ian,

That it is only mentioned in the example and not cf. conceptual data 
modelling is not ideal, but better no change at all. At this late stage 
I will not push further and so I'm satisfied with the working group's 
response.

Best regards,
Marijke

Ian Horrocks ha scritto:
> Dear Marijke,
>
> Thank you for your comment
>      
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Mar/0014.html> 
>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> We changed the text in Section 9.5 of the OWL 2 Structural 
> Specification and Functional-Style Syntax [1] to talk about (lack of) 
> functionality and to include an example.
>
> Does this adequately address your concerns?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#Keys
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to 
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should 
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you 
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Ian Horrocks
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
>
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 13:43:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 March 2009 13:43:22 GMT