Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree

Thanks. I am satisfied with the working group's response to my comment  
and apologize for failing to notice that this document was not in last  
call.

Jonathan

On Mar 4, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> Dear Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for your message
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0000.html 
> >
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> The RDF Semantics document was not at last call.  It has recently been
> changed so that imports is no longer a semantic issue.  The editor of
> the RDF Semantics document will be working with you to improve the
> related presentation issues.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group