W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > March 2009

Re: [LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:52:57 -0800
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <A8798B42-DD2B-40F5-895E-0E17D66325F8@creativecommons.org>
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Thanks. I am satisfied with the working group's response to my comment  
and apologize for failing to notice that this document was not in last  
call.

Jonathan

On Mar 4, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> Dear Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for your message
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0000.html 
> >
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> The RDF Semantics document was not at last call.  It has recently been
> changed so that imports is no longer a semantic issue.  The editor of
> the RDF Semantics document will be working with you to improve the
> related presentation issues.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 04:53:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 March 2009 04:53:41 GMT