W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > March 2009

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:54:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090304.165435.162216732.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jar@creativecommons.org
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Dear Jonathan,

Thank you for your message
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

The RDF Semantics document was not at last call.  It has recently been
changed so that imports is no longer a semantic issue.  The editor of
the RDF Semantics document will be working with you to improve the
related presentation issues. 

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
<mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. 

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:54:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:29 UTC