Thursday, 1 March 2001
Wednesday, 28 February 2001
Tuesday, 27 February 2001
- Re: Complex Type Definition Schema Component (Structures)
- Re: Bug in XSV?
- Re: Complex Type Definition Schema Component (Structures)
- Re: Bug in XSV?
Monday, 26 February 2001
- Re: Bug in XSV?
- Re: [Moderator Action] Inheritance and Identity-constraint
- Re: <notation> and namespaces
- Re: DTD for Schemas (Non-normative) comment
- Re: Bug in XSV?
- Re: Question about all, choice, and sequence
- Re: Bug in XSV?
Sunday, 25 February 2001
- Re: Complex Type Definition Schema Component (Structures)
- Re: Mixing Schema for Schema with DTD for Schema
- Question about all, choice, and sequence
Saturday, 24 February 2001
- Mixing Schema for Schema with DTD for Schema
- DTD for Schemas (Non-normative) comment
- Re: Bug in XSV?
- Re: Complex Type Definition Schema Component (Structures)
- RE: Complex Type Definition Schema Component (Structures)
- Complex Type Definition Schema Component (Structures)
- Bug in XSV?
Friday, 23 February 2001
Thursday, 22 February 2001
- Coupled Chameleon Components?
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- <notation> and namespaces
- Re: Status of candidate recommendation
- Re: Deriving various simpleContent and complexContent types from the same base?
- Re: [Moderator Action] Inheritance and Identity-constraint
- Status of candidate recommendation
- Re: Deriving various simpleContent and complexContent types from the same base?
- It seems to be an error in Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative)
Wednesday, 21 February 2001
- Re: [Moderator Action] Inheritance and Identity-constraint
- Re: attribute use="prohibited"
- Re: Deriving various simpleContent and complexContent types from the same base?
- Re: [Moderator Action] Inheritance and Identity-constraint
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- Re: Quick technical question.
- Re: attribute use="prohibited"
- Re: attribute use="prohibited"
- Deriving various simpleContent and complexContent types from the same base?
Tuesday, 20 February 2001
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- Re: Quick technical question.
- Re: attribute use="prohibited"
Monday, 19 February 2001
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- Re: NOTATIONs
- Re: xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- xmlspy: does ##other apply to only subsequent target ns
- NOTATIONs
- Re: What is ur-definition ?
- Re: [Moderator Action] Schema Group
- Re: [Moderator Action] Default for elements
- Re: Quick technical question.
- Re: attribute use="prohibited"
- attribute use="prohibited"
- Quick technical question.
- Re: What is ur-definition ?
Sunday, 18 February 2001
- Re: What is ur-definition ?
- Re: question on important and restriction
- Re: question on important and restriction
- Re: question on important and restriction
- Re: What is ur-definition ?
- question on important and restriction
Friday, 16 February 2001
Thursday, 15 February 2001
- Re: Root element
- Re: Root element
- Re: Validity Rule - Where does Element's {abstract} appear?
- Re: Validity Rule - Where does Element's {abstract} appear?
Wednesday, 14 February 2001
- Survey for XML Schema CR-37: Default prefix for schema namespace
- Root element
- Re: Tool: Free Simple XML/DTD/Schema Generator
- Re: [Moderator Action] XHTML in Schema
- Re: Validity Rule - Where does Element's {abstract} appear?
- Re: What is ur-definition ?
- Re: Tool: Free Simple XML/DTD/Schema Generator
- Re: What is ur-definition ?
- Tool: Free Simple XML/DTD/Schema Generator
- Validity Rule - Where does Element's {abstract} appear?
Tuesday, 13 February 2001
- Re: Simple extname<->URI-ref hack
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
Monday, 12 February 2001
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Simple extname<->URI-ref hack
- RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- dtd objects and duplicate element names
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: validating schema's locally - without accessing the internet
- RE: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- RE: validating schema's locally - without accessing the internet
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: validating schema's locally - without accessing the internet
- validating schema's locally - without accessing the internet
- RE: C type array and struct
- Re: [Moderator Action] elements and attribute-values
- Re: [Moderator Action] elements and attribute-values
- Re: [Moderator Action] Linking Schema with instance files
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: anySimpleType
- Re: does RDF require understanding all 82 URI schemes?
- Re: anySimpleType
Saturday, 10 February 2001
Friday, 9 February 2001
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: XML Schema parser
- RE: XML Schema parser
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: About timeDuration format
- Re: XML Schema parser
- RE: XML Schema parser
- Re: XML Schema parser
- XML Schema parser
- RE: About timeDuration format
Thursday, 8 February 2001
- About timeDuration format
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- java code for retrieving node names and node values from DOM Tree
- Poorly researched observations on <xsd:key>, <xsd:keyref> and <xs d:unique>
- Re: anySimpleType
- anySimpleType
- Re: Can schemas validate parts of an instance document?
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- What is ur-definition ?
- Re: Whitespace as a constraining facet?
- Re: Whitespace as a constraining facet?
- RE: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Re: Can schemas validate parts of an instance document?
- Re: XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
- Can schemas validate parts of an instance document?
- XSV Crash on XHTML Schema
Wednesday, 7 February 2001
- has someone written a schema parser ??
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- Re: [Moderator Action] XSV and local model group definitions
- Understanding pattern facet expressions
- Re: does schema support relational and logical opertors ??
- Re: xmL Schema : can a complexType element contain other complextype elements ??
- Re: Normalization (whiteSpace)
- Re: does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- Re: Whitespace as a constraining facet?
- Re: xmL Schema : can a complexType element contain other complextype elements ??
- Re: does schema provide schematron support ??
- RE: does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- Whitespace as a constraining facet?
- Re: Normalization (whiteSpace)
Tuesday, 6 February 2001
- Re: does schema support relational and logical opertors ??
- Re: xmL Schema : can a complexType element contain other complextype elements ??
- RE: xmL Schema : can a complexType element contain other complext ype elements ??
- xmL Schema : can a complexType element contain other complextype elements ??
- does schema provide schematron support ??
- does schema support relational and logical opertors ??
- does schema support relational and logical opertors ??
- Normalization (whiteSpace)
- Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [Moderator Action] Validator for XML Schema 20000922 version
- Re: [Moderator Action] Validator for XML Schema 20000922 version
- Re: [Moderator Action] Validator for XML Schema 20000922 version
Monday, 5 February 2001
- Re: does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- Re: does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- Re: does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- does DOM Object contain schema elements also ??
- Re: C type array and struct
Sunday, 4 February 2001
Monday, 5 February 2001
Sunday, 4 February 2001
Saturday, 3 February 2001
- Re: [Moderator Action] Anonymous Types with same name problem
- Re: C type array and struct
- Re: C type array and struct
Friday, 2 February 2001
- Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- RE: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- Re: Can I refer a Schema from within a DTD ??
- Can I refer a Schema from within a DTD ??
- partial validation with Schema and DTD ??]]
- Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
- FAQ of the day - was Re: Can I combine Schema and DTD ??
- RE: [Moderator Action] Anonymous Types with same name problem
- Re: List and union varieties
- Re: List and union varieties
- Re: List and union varieties
- Re: [Moderator Action] Anonymous Types with same name problem
- Re: Can I combine Schema and DTD ??
- Re: how to constraint sinmpleTypes
- Re: Should data be changed according to defaults in Schema?
- RE: Should data be changed according to defaults in Schema?
- Re: Should data be changed according to defaults in Schema?
- Should data be changed according to defaults in Schema?
- C type array and struct
Thursday, 1 February 2001
- Re: schema error : undefined value for 'type' encountered
- schema error : undefined value for 'type' encountered
- Can I combine Schema and DTD ??
- Re: [Moderator Action] Including more than one schema
- Re: XML versus Relational Database
- RE: XML versus Relational Database
- Re: valid maxOccurs values
- Re: simpleContent and restriction
- Re: XML versus Relational Database
- XML versus Relational Database