- From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 13:19:54 +0000
- To: Edmund Mitchell <EMitchell@fnf.com>
- CC: xmlSchema-dev <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Edmund Mitchell wrote: > > >It's a good FAQ. What in particular do you like about it? > > It's indexed according to common problem areas, as opposed to say, by > thread. I find this superior, because when I have a problem, I can see the > link to an area that deals with that kind of problem. > You've probably never needed to look at it, being a guru, but there are > sections on i.e. or grouping, because these issues seem to snag each > new generation of XSLT learners. This has helped me quite a bit. Having > said that, I'm too much of a Schema newbie to say for sure that such an > indexing system will lend itself to Schema FAQS-perhaps you experts can > better make that call, or let time make it apparent to us all. > I know some XSLT (though you're right - I hadn't realised just how much work Dave's put in), but I'm no expert - let alone guru - on schemas. Learning, though... I too would like to use an issue structure rather than a thread structure. I'm hoping that there will be helpful posts summarising potential FAQs, but I'll do the summary myself where necessary and put it up for comment. > >Do you have strong feeling about the superiority of multi-doc vs. > >single-doc FAQs? > > I have strong feelings about those people who do the work for FAQS - strong > feelings of gratitude. If it pops your tarts to have a single-doc format, > and it'll make being the keeper of the FAQ an easier chore for you, than I'm > all for it. > I'll keep it single doc for the moment, and thanks for the sentiments. Which remind me - I must put in an appreciative link to my tolerant employers... Francis.
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 08:09:30 UTC