www-ws-desc@w3.org from October 2004 by date

Sunday, 31 October 2004

• RE: Raising an ugly issue again Anne Thomas Manes

Friday, 29 October 2004

• Minutes, 28 Oct 2004 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 28 October 2004

• RE: Idle question David Orchard
• RE: Agenda, 28 October 2004 WS Desc telcon David Orchard
• Raising an ugly issue again Anne Thomas Manes
• Primer feedback David Booth

Wednesday, 27 October 2004

• Re: LC21 resolution issues Hugo Haas
• Re: LC21 resolution issues Amelia A Lewis
• LC21 resolution issues Hugo Haas
• RE: Idle question Martin Gudgin
• Re: Idle question Sanjiva Weerawarana

Tuesday, 26 October 2004

• Re: Idle question Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Idle question Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Idle question Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Idle question Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Idle question Amelia A Lewis
• Agenda, 28 October 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 22 October 2004

• Minutes, 21 Oct 2004 WS Description WG Jacek Kopecky
• Re: SOAP Modules and Features (LC18, LC29b) Prasad Yendluri

Thursday, 21 October 2004

• RE: Formal objections Jonathan Marsh
• Belated regrets Bijan Parsia
• Re: SOAP Modules and Features (LC18, LC29b) Marc Hadley
• RE: SOAP Modules and Features (LC18, LC29b) Glen Daniels
• Formal objections Glen Daniels
• RE: SOAP Modules and Features (LC18, LC29b) Asir Vedamuthu
• SOAP Modules and Features (LC18, LC29b) Glen Daniels

Wednesday, 20 October 2004

• The LC19 Story - Reusable Fault Components Asir Vedamuthu

Tuesday, 19 October 2004

• Agenda, 21 October 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: is operation/@pattern optional? Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: is operation/@pattern optional? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: is operation/@pattern optional? Amelia A Lewis

Monday, 18 October 2004

• Re: is operation/@pattern optional? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: is operation/@pattern optional? Amelia A Lewis
• RE: is operation/@pattern optional? Tom Jordahl
• Re: is operation/@pattern optional? Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Minutes, 14 Oct 2004 WS Description WG Hugo Haas

Friday, 15 October 2004

• is operation/@pattern optional? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments Jonathan Marsh
• Re: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments Jeff Mischkinsky

Thursday, 14 October 2004

• RE: Minutes, 14 Oct 2004 WS Description WG paul.downey@bt.com
• Minutes, 14 Oct 2004 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh
• Belated regrets for Oct 14 Tom Jordahl
• Regrets for today's call Glen Daniels
• Hiding and Showing Z Notation in the Spec. Arthur Ryman

Wednesday, 13 October 2004

• Agenda, 14 October 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Minutes of 2004-10-07 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 12 October 2004

• ANN: Call for Participation: ICSOC '04 Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 11 October 2004

• Re: Example of Z Notation in WSDL 2.0 Component Model Spec Arthur Ryman

Monday, 4 October 2004

• Sharm El-Sheikh: 10 - 18 December, 2004 - Achieving Business Excellence. Settec Training

Thursday, 7 October 2004

• Minutes of 2004-10-07 WS Desc telcon Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? David Booth
• Draft onotlogy for RDF Mapping Bijan Parsia
• RE: plan for primer examples David Booth
• RE: LC45: {http location} sometimes a template, sometimes not Asir Vedamuthu

Wednesday, 6 October 2004

• Action item about LC5f (errors and fatal errors) Roberto Chinnici
• [revised] Agenda, 7 October 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? Pete Hendry
• RE: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? Glen Daniels
• Re: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? Pete Hendry

Tuesday, 5 October 2004

• Potential LC version of the media types doc Anish Karmarkar
• Agenda, 7 October 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments Jonathan Marsh
• Re: WSDL2.0 Last Call comments Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? David Booth
• WSDL2.0 Last Call comments Steve Ross-Talbot

Monday, 4 October 2004

• RE: On the Operation Name Mapping requirement Savas Parastatidis
• RE: On the Operation Name Mapping requirement Savas Parastatidis
• Re: On the Operation Name Mapping requirement Roberto Chinnici
• RE: plan for primer examples Liu, Kevin
• RE: plan for primer examples Liu, Kevin
• Proposed media type registration: application/wsdl+xml David Booth
• RE: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? Glen Daniels
• RE: On the Operation Name Mapping requirement Glen Daniels
• On the Operation Name Mapping requirement Savas Parastatidis

Thursday, 30 September 2004

• Re: Improved Example of Z Notation Helen Chen
• Egypt's unique seminars in October 2004 Settec Training

Friday, 1 October 2004

• Re: plan for primer examples David Booth
• Re: plan for primer examples David Booth
• plan for primer examples Liu, Kevin
• Implementation of the resolution to LC29e Hugo Haas

Monday, 27 September 2004

• Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? Jeehong Min

Friday, 1 October 2004

• Media type for 1.1 (was Re: Scribe's version of the minutes of the 2004-09-30 teleconference) Hugo Haas

Last message date: Sunday, 31 October 2004 22:45:32 UTC