- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:45:34 -0400
- To: "Pete Hendry" <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>, "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jeehong Min" <jeehongm@parasoft.com>, "WS Description List" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi Pete: Well, sure that would be easy, but I think this is the exact same problem as if you had: WSDL: <wsdl:definitions> <wsdl:types> <wsdl:include location="xsd1"/> </wsdl:types> </wsdl:definitions> XSD1: <xs:schema> <xs:element name="foo" type="xs:int"/> <xs:include location="xsd2"/> <xs:schema> XSD2: <xs:schema> <xs:element name="bar" type="xs:float"/> </xs:schema> This wouldn't trigger your case below, but it would still result in a "merged" schema, wouldn't it? And if you replace "bar" in XSD2 with "foo", you get a conflict which needs to somehow be resolved. I think this should have already been dealt with by the schema group, but a cursory search hasn't yet netted me anything. I glanced through the somewhat dense text of http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#compound-schema, but didn't see any obvious statement about what to do if components are redefined without an explicit <redefine> tag. Rather than disallowing it, I think we should simply treat it as a synonym for including the two <schema> elements, and simply be clear on how that should resolve, with guidance from the schema WG as David suggested. --Glen > -----Original Message----- > From: Pete Hendry [mailto:peter.hendry@capeclear.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 6:50 PM > To: David Booth > Cc: Glen Daniels; Jeehong Min; WS Description List > Subject: Re: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? > > Rather than say you cannot be clear about it why not make a > clear statement: > > It is not permitted and if it is present then it is an error. > > Nothing ambiguous there and it clears up the issue. It is a > lot easier for an implementation to detect this and error > than it is to try to work around it merging schemas and such. > Is there a purpose in allowing it? > > Pete > > David Booth wrote: > > >This is an interesting question, and I think it needs to be > clarified > >in our spec, in case others also run into this issue. I've just > >written to the XML Schema group for clarification from an > XML Schema point of view: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2 004OctDec/ > >0001.html > > > >Perhaps we should suggest that WSDL authors avoid doing > this, in order > >to avoid the issue, if we cannot be clear about whether or not it is > >permitted and what it means. > > > > > >On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 11:24, Glen Daniels wrote: > > > > > >>Jeehong: > >> > >>As long as there is no overlap between the component definitions in > >>multiple schema containers for the same namespace, I think > this should > >>work just fine. If there is overlap, we simply need to follow what > >>the schema spec says about how to resolve repeated components in a > >>schema (I'm not sure, though, if that's fault, first-one-wins, or > >>last-one-wins...). > >> > >>--Glen > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > >>>[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jeehong Min > >>>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 12:48 PM > >>>To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > >>>Subject: Can multiple inline schemas have same targetNamespace? > >>> > >>>I would appreciate it if you could address the following > issue that I > >>>have seen in WSDLs of 2 customers in the past month. > >>> > >>>One vendor's SOAP stack is creating WSDLs with multiple inline > >>>schemas that have the same namespace. > >>> > >>>Here's an example: > >>><wsdl:definition> > >>><wsdl:types> > >>><xs:schema targetNamespace="a"> > >>>types and elements > >>></xs:schema> > >>><xs:schema targetNamespace="a"> > >>>different types and elements > >>></xs:schema> > >>><xs:schema targetNamespace="b"> > >>>whatever > >>></xs:schema> > >>></wsdl:types> > >>>... > >>><wsdl:definition> > >>> > >>>It's not clear to me whether the above is legal or not > (two schemas > >>>with the same targetNamespace="a"). Should XML parsers > for WSDL be > >>>smart enough to handle the above? Or should parsers report errors? > >>> > >>>-- > >>>Jeehong Min > >>>Software Engineer > >>>SOAPtest Development > >>>Parasoft Corporation > >>> > >>>"We Make Software Work" > >>> > >>> > >>> > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2004 02:45:56 UTC