- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:43:54 -0400
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:27:34 +0600 Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote: > For some reason I recall that we made operation/@pattern optional > (using the heuristics I had proposed for how to compute it for > certain patterns). However the spec says its required! > > Am I hallucinating? Yup. There was strong opposition to using those heuristics. I just wrote a couple of paragraphs reiterating those arguments, but I guess I'll spare you that, on mature reflection. :-) We made the labels of messages optional. The pattern URI is required, in all cases. Order of input and output elements in the operation element is not significant. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 16:44:44 UTC