- From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:54:45 -0400
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:50:43 -0700 Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> wrote: > What would it mean for wsdl 2.0 doc to import/include wsdl 1.1 doc in > terms of the component model? That's a better statement of my question, perhaps. > The stated purpose of import/include is to > modularize descriptions. I'm assuming that you want to do a > wsdl20:import or wsdl20:include. No, I don't wanna do *nothin'* if I can help it. In process of setting up tests and things for implementation, though, I encountered the question: if a wsdl20:import points at a document which is WSDL 1.1, can it be imported? There does not seem to be a prohibition in the specification. > What is the purpose -- do you want to import/include wsdl 1.1 doc in > wsdl 2.0 and refer to wsdl 1.1 artifacts in wsdl 2.0 components? *I* want to write a processor that fulfills expectations and is conformant to the specification. I'm not clear on whether that means that I need to permit import (or worse, include) of WSDL 1.1, and if so, what the semantic would be. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 18:55:28 UTC