Tuesday, 31 December 2002
Monday, 16 December 2002
Friday, 13 December 2002
Monday, 9 December 2002
Tuesday, 3 December 2002
Saturday, 30 November 2002
Thursday, 28 November 2002
- [admin]: [dialog] Hamerich - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [Admin]: [dialog] McGee/Blaszczak - Final request for response toVoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [admin]: Response to Change Request R415 ( Cont.. Ignore the first )
- Clarification on Voice XML file and grammar file interaction required
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
Friday, 22 November 2002
Thursday, 21 November 2002
Thursday, 14 November 2002
Wednesday, 13 November 2002
- RE: [dialog] Berche #1, #2, #3 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: [dialog] Guillaume #6 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] McGee/Blaszczak - Final request for response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Tingander - Final request for response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: [dialog] Guillaume #6 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: [dialog] Berche #1, #2, #3 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
Wednesday, 6 November 2002
Thursday, 31 October 2002
Wednesday, 30 October 2002
Tuesday, 29 October 2002
- [dialog] Tingander #2 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Guillaume #6 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- SRGS: Metadata containing both " and ' in ABNF format
Monday, 28 October 2002
Saturday, 26 October 2002
Thursday, 24 October 2002
- grXML grammar question
- grammar file should be loaded and cached when the voice server starts. Is this possible?
- RE: [dialog] Guillaume #4 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- updated version of SRGS Implementation Report Plan available
Wednesday, 23 October 2002
Tuesday, 22 October 2002
- RE: [dialog] Guillaume #4 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: [dialog] Guillaume #5 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Guillaume #5 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Guillaume #4 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] McGee - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: [cc] Proposed CCXML Changes From F2F vs JCC, etc
Thursday, 17 October 2002
Wednesday, 16 October 2002
Tuesday, 15 October 2002
- More comments on draft from Apr 24, 2002.
- RE: [dialog] Berche #1, #2, #3 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
Monday, 14 October 2002
- RE: The <nomatch> element inside a <record> element.
- [cc] Proposed CCXML Changes From F2F vs JCC, etc
Sunday, 13 October 2002
Wednesday, 9 October 2002
- Speech Browser Component Recommendations
- RE: [dialog] Berche #3 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Tingander - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: [dialog] Berche #2 - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Whitmer - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- [dialog] Berche - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues (updated)
- RE: [dialog] Berche - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
Tuesday, 8 October 2002
Monday, 7 October 2002
- RE: Shadowing of a <link>
- Re: Shadowing of a <link>
- Shadowing of a <link>
- RE: [dialog] Hamerich - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: Hidden field
- RE: Hidden field
Sunday, 6 October 2002
Wednesday, 2 October 2002
- cavo s-video o cavetto a 3 jack ?
- RE: [dialog] Hamerich - VBWG official response to VoiceXML 2.0 Last Call Review Issues
- RE: Grammar question : multiple keywords
- Grammar question : multiple keywords