RE: [cc] Proposed CCXML Changes From F2F vs JCC, etc

We might have to expand <destroyconference> to include "disconnect all
participants."  That is something you expect from a bridge, for example.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Heileman, David W
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:31 PM
[snip]
> Note: Some telephony APIs do not define a separate conference object,
> instead defining a conference simply as a call with more than two parties.
> In order to accommodate the widest range of underlying telephony
> APIs, CCXML
> assumes a separate conference object.  When implemented above an API that
> does not support this construct, it is suggested that the callid
> be returned
> to the id attribute of the <createconference> tag, and that the
> <destroyconference> tag be ignored.

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 22:41:39 UTC