At 16:14 25/09/02 +0200, Scott McGlashan wrote: >The Voice Browser Working Group (VBWG) has almost >finished resolving the issues raised during the last call >review of the 24 April 2002 VoiceXML 2.0 [1]. Our apologies that >it has taken so long to respond. > >This is the VBWG's formal response to the issues you raised, >which have been logged in the Working Group's issues list [4]. >The VBWG's resolutions have been incorporated into the 13 September >2002 draft of the VoiceXML 2.0 [5]. > >Please indicate before 3 October 2002 whether you are satisfied with the >VBWG's resolutions, whether you think there has been a >misunderstanding, or whether you wish to register an objection. >If you do not think you can respond before 3 October, please let me >know. The Director will appreciate a response whether you agree >with the resolutions or not. I am satisified with all the responses given to my comments. Thank you, Matthew WilsonReceived on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 14:07:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:03:46 UTC