www-tag@w3.org from February 2014 by date

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Jim Taylor

Friday, 28 February 2014

• Re: Some comments on the draft TAG EME paper Mark Watson
• Re: Some comments on the draft TAG EME paper Henri Sivonen
• Some comments on the draft TAG EME paper Mark Watson

Thursday, 27 February 2014

• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Henri Sivonen

Wednesday, 26 February 2014

• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Henri Sivonen

Tuesday, 25 February 2014

• Re: WEIRDS and use of fixed URIs David Booth
• Re: WEIRDS and use of fixed URIs Martin J. Dürst

Monday, 24 February 2014

• Re: draft of 209 proposal Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: draft of 209 proposal David Booth
• draft of Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Konstantinov Sergey

Saturday, 22 February 2014

• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Jeni Tennison
• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Jeni Tennison
• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Jeni Tennison

Friday, 21 February 2014

• RE: Form submission participation (was Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review) Domenic Denicola
• Re: Form submission participation (was Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review) Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Charles McCathie Nevile
• Re: WEIRDS and use of fixed URIs Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 20 February 2014

• [shadow-styling] Named parts, styling built-in form controls, and shadow styling (was Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Form submission participation (was Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Form submission participation (was Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review) Charles Pritchard
• Form submission participation (was Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review) Edward O'Connor
• Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review Elliott Sprehn
• Re: Goals for Shadow DOM review Dimitri Glazkov
• Goals for Shadow DOM review Domenic Denicola
• RE: Shadow DOM background reading Domenic Denicola
• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Henri Sivonen

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

• Comments on w3ctag/eme/ Henri Sivonen
• WEIRDS and use of fixed URIs Yves Lafon

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

• Capability URLs WD published Yves Lafon
• Spec review for quota management, please review Domenic Denicola

Monday, 17 February 2014

• 2014-02-13 Minutes Konstantinov Sergey
• Re: [webcomponents] Imperative API for Insertion Points Ryosuke Niwa

Sunday, 16 February 2014

• Re: [webcomponents] Imperative API for Insertion Points Alex Russell
• Re: [webcomponents] Imperative API for Insertion Points Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Imperative API for Insertion Points Ryosuke Niwa
• Re: [webcomponents] Imperative API for Insertion Points Alex Russell

Saturday, 15 February 2014

• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Marcos Caceres

Thursday, 13 February 2014

• Re: Linking to publicly available material not infringement, CJEU rules Wendy Seltzer
• Shadow DOM background reading Domenic Denicola
• Re: A new HTTP response code say 209 Reto Gmür
• Re: Linking to publicly available material not infringement, CJEU rules Ashok Malhotra
• Linking to publicly available material not infringement, CJEU rules Wendy Seltzer
• Re: A new HTTP response code say 209 Yves Lafon
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Jonas Sicking

Monday, 10 February 2014

• Re: A new HTTP response code say 209 Ashok Malhotra

Friday, 7 February 2014

• Request for clarification, was Re: Minutes for 6 Feb Marcos Caceres
• Re: Packaging Reflections Robin Berjon
• Minutes for 6 Feb Daniel Appelquist
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell

Thursday, 6 February 2014

• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell
• Re: Capability URLs & Referer headers Anne van Kesteren
• Packaging Reflections Jeni Tennison
• Capability URLs draft updated Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Marcos Caceres

Wednesday, 5 February 2014

• RE: Capability URLs & Referer headers John Kemp
• Capability URLs & Referer headers Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Packaging on the Web Mark Baker
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Robin Berjon
• Once more on techical aspects of DRM Konstantinov Sergey
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Robin Berjon
• Re: Fall back strategy for manifest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison

Monday, 3 February 2014

• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell
• Re: Packaging on the Web Herbert van de Sompel
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell

Sunday, 2 February 2014

• Re: Packaging on the Web Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: Packaging on the Web Jeni Tennison
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell
• Re: Packaging on the Web Alex Russell

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2014 16:25:29 UTC