- From: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:54:54 -0800
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 17:56:21 UTC
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > Alex, > > > > Does having a simple textual manifest file that just lists the content > of > > > the package as the first item in the package help at all? > > > > Unclear. It's a foot-race, after all. A client will do request to get the > > document, which usually streams in pretty quickly relative to the RTT's > you > > need to navigate for sub-resources. This is confounded by advice like > this > > which indicates to authors that they should be requesting some resources > as > > early as possible in their documents: > > > > > https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/best-practices/rtt#PutStylesBeforeScripts > > > > This is especially important for resources that are going to be fetched > > off-origin and for which warming up DNS can add considerable latency. > > Just to note that packages won’t contain off-origin resources, Does that mean you can't request off-origin packages with off-origin resources? That would also be fatal. > so it’s still perfectly reasonable for publishers/browsers to do that. Not > that I think it affects the majority of your argument. > > Jeni > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/ >
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 17:56:21 UTC