- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 05:33:51 -0800
- To: twirl@yandex-team.ru
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
Sergey, Do you have any thoughts about Henri’s comments below on the Accessibility section of the draft at https://github.com/w3ctag/eme ? Please feel free to edit the text directly. Jeni ------------------------------------------------------ From: Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi Reply: Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi Date: 19 February 2014 at 05:55:11 To: www-tag www-tag@w3.org Subject: Comments on w3ctag/eme/ [snip] > > DRM systems usually prohibit any manipulations with content > including > > displaying third-party subtitles, > > As far as I can tell, nothing in EME itself or in shipped > implementations prevents compositing HTML/CSS content over > a video > than uses EME-involved DRM. In fact, if you use Netflix with IE11 > on > Windows 8.1, you'll find that the service *relies* on being able > to > composite HTML/CSS content over EME-involved video frames. > > > or (in case of e-books) reading a book using system voice-over > engine, > > thus making a content less accessible by disabled people. > > True, but how is this relevant to EME as long as browsers don't > provide client-side speech recognition or computer vision-based > description for DRMless videos? [snip] -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Saturday, 22 February 2014 13:34:17 UTC