- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:55:33 +0100
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 04/02/2014 11:36 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Anyone setting metadata in script deserves to be ignored. > > This has been bugging me a little bit... won't there be situations > where one might need to pollyfill this or a future version to support > legacy user agents? That might mean having to add the metadata after > the document has loaded through script to get the desired behavior > through proprietary means or through some other existing mechanism in > HTML. > > If the above holds, then the ability to add things dynamically should > probably be seen as an ok thing, rather than something that "deserves > to be ignored", no? I really don't see what situation could arise in which you would want to dynamically fill out <meta> elements providing your application name. I think that planning for this is contrived and adds unnecessary complexity. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 10:55:45 UTC