- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:14:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hi,
There is a discussion going on in apps-discuss [1] aboud weirds-bootstrap [2]
using a fixed URI path to address parts of their protocol.
This seems to go against the spirit of AWWW on URI opacity [3] and mnot's
"URI Design and Ownership" draft.
Do the TAG want to be part of that discussion?
Cheers,
[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg11386.html
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap/
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-opacity
[4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-get-off-my-lawn-01
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 13:14:24 UTC