public-webcrypto@w3.org from February 2014 by author

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Algorithm aliasing and JWK algorithm names (Saturday, 1 February)

Aymeric Vitte

• Fwd: Update on Streams API Status (Monday, 10 February)

Bruno Oliveira

• Re: Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)

Eric Roman

• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)

GALINDO Virginie

• Reminder : next monday @ 20:00 UTC, Q&A session to the editors (Friday, 28 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - reminder : calls on the 24th of February @ 09:00 UTC *and* 20:00 UTC (Friday, 21 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - regular conf call (WG participants only) (Monday, 17 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - regular conf call (WG participants only) (Monday, 17 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - regular conf call (WG participants only) (Monday, 17 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - Future work : straw man proposal for a workshop on hardware token and secure services (Friday, 14 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - cancelling London F2F meeting on 27th of Feb (Friday, 14 February)
• RE: Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - moving to github in the future ? (Thursday, 13 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - take away from 10th of Feb call (Thursday, 13 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - F2F meeting in London on 27th of Feb - please register (Tuesday, 11 February)
• RE: Key Ownership and SOP exception (Tuesday, 11 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - Reminder : we have our regular call today @ 20:00 (Monday, 10 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - asian call take awayo 10th of february (Monday, 10 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - alternative details for the asia call (Monday, 10 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - Reminder : call with asia today @9:00 UTC (Monday, 10 February)
• W3C DOM4 is in Last Call (Friday, 7 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our next call (Wednesday, 5 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - Conceal : a high level API for android (by Facebook) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - London 27th of February informal F2F meeting : please register (Monday, 3 February)
• W3C Web Crypto WG - Asian call delay to 10th of Feb @ 09:00 UTC (Monday, 3 February)

Harry Halpin

• Re: Copying bugs to the mailing list (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Copying bugs to the mailing list (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Meeting minutes for Feb 24th telecon (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: WebCrypto @ Korea WWW2014 - need help/talks (Monday, 24 February)
• WebCrypto @ Korea WWW2014 - need help/talks (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - cancelling London F2F meeting on 27th of Feb (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - moving to github in the future ? (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Minutes for WebCrypto Feb 10th meeting (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Workshop around hardware tokens/FIDO - suggested dates and times (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - agenda for our next call (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Asian call delay to 10th of Feb @ 09:00 UTC (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Asian call next monday 3rd of Feb @ 09:00 UTC (Monday, 3 February)

Israel Hilerio

• WorkerCrypto interface concerns from Microsoft (Tuesday, 25 February)

Jim Schaad

• RE: Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: Bug 24806 - Should the spec mandate a minimum key length for HMAC? (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: Consider whether the others Public Value input to (EC)DH deriveKey should be a Key object (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: Bug 24410 - AES-CBC description (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: SPKI export needs additional parameter (Tuesday, 25 February)
• SPKI export needs additional parameter (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Diffie-Hellman question (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Bug 20611 - specify JWK encoding as UTF-8 (Sunday, 23 February)
• RE: Diffie-Hellman question (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Diffie-Hellman question (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Bug 24410 - AES-GCM (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• AES-CMAC - MAC lengths other than 128 (Friday, 21 February)
• Bug 20611 - specify JWK encoding as UTF-8 (Friday, 21 February)
• Bug 24410 - AES-GCM (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Bug 24755 - Decide which AES-CFB shift sizes to support (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Bug 24755 - Decide which AES-CFB shift sizes to support (Friday, 21 February)
• Bug 24410 - AES-CBC description (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Friday, 21 February)
• Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: Bug #23500 - Raw AES Access (Thursday, 20 February)
• Bug #23500 - Raw AES Access (Wednesday, 19 February)
• RE: Registered algorithm vs supported algorithm (Saturday, 1 February)
• EC Point Representations (Saturday, 1 February)
• Registered algorithm vs supported algorithm (Saturday, 1 February)
• Algorithm aliasing and JWK algorithm names (Saturday, 1 February)

Mark Watson

• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 24806 - Should the spec mandate a minimum key length for HMAC? (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 23833 - Remove sequence IDL keyword from parameters that take CryptoOperationData (Friday, 28 February)
• Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Friday, 28 February)
• Bug 24806 - Should the spec mandate a minimum key length for HMAC? (Friday, 28 February)
• Bug 23833 - Remove sequence IDL keyword from parameters that take CryptoOperationData (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 24410 - AES-CBC description (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Consider whether the others Public Value input to (EC)DH deriveKey should be a Key object (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR (Friday, 28 February)
• Specification updates (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR (Thursday, 27 February)
• inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Consider whether the others Public Value input to (EC)DH deriveKey should be a Key object (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Why is the derivedKeyType parameter to deriveKey nullable ? (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Bug 24410 - AES-CBC description (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Support optional private value length for DH PKCS#3 ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Support optional private value length for DH PKCS#3 ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Diffie-Hellman question (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Diffie-Hellman question (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Diffie-Hellman question (Monday, 24 February)
• Diffie-Hellman question (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug 24410 - AES-GCM (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: AES-CMAC - MAC lengths other than 128 (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug 24410 - AES-CBC description (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug 24755 - Decide which AES-CFB shift sizes to support (Friday, 21 February)
• Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Thursday, 20 February)
• Bug 24755 - Decide which AES-CFB shift sizes to support (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Bug #23500 - Raw AES Access (Thursday, 20 February)
• Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Bug #23500 - Raw AES Access (Thursday, 20 February)
• Editors' Draft update (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Saturday, 15 February)
• AES CFB input parameter "s" (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Current status of pre-Last Call bugs (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: Current status of pre-Last Call bugs (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: Current status of pre-Last Call bugs (Friday, 7 February)
• Current status of pre-Last Call bugs (Friday, 7 February)
• Copying bugs to mailing list (Thursday, 6 February)
• Bug 24427 - make all errors asynchronous (Thursday, 6 February)
• To wrap or to wrapKey ?? (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)

Mike Jones

• RE: Bug 20611 - specify JWK encoding as UTF-8 (Sunday, 23 February)
• RE: Bug 20611 - specify JWK encoding as UTF-8 (Friday, 21 February)
• RE: Bug #23500 - Raw AES Access (Thursday, 20 February)
• RE: To wrap or to wrapKey ?? (Wednesday, 5 February)
• RE: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)
• RE: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)
• RE: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)
• RE: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)

Mountie Lee

• Re: WebCrypto @ Korea WWW2014 - need help/talks (Monday, 24 February)
• will the key reference available sent via postMessage? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Key Ownership and SOP exception (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - Asian call next monday 3rd of Feb @ 09:00 UTC (Monday, 3 February)

Richard Barnes

• Re: AES-CMAC - MAC lengths other than 128 (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: AES-CMAC - MAC lengths other than 128 (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Bug 24457 - AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: Bug #23500 - Raw AES Access (Thursday, 20 February)
• ISSUE-44 and ISSUE-46 (Thursday, 13 February)

Ryan Sleevi

• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: Bug 24806 - Should the spec mandate a minimum key length for HMAC? (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 24813 - Decide whether methods should return DOMError or null on failure (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Bug 23833 - Remove sequence IDL keyword from parameters that take CryptoOperationData (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: Consider whether the others Public Value input to (EC)DH deriveKey should be a Key object (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Friday, 28 February)
• RE: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: What happended to SecretAgreee? (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: Why is the derivedKeyType parameter to deriveKey nullable ? (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Bug 24410 - AES-CBC description (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: SPKI export needs additional parameter (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: Copying bugs to the mailing list (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: SPKI export needs additional parameter (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Support optional private value length for DH PKCS#3 ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Copying bugs to the mailing list (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Monday, 24 February)
• Mail list archives & formatting of messages (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Diffie-Hellman question (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Diffie-Hellman question (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: Diffie-Hellman question (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: AES-CMAC - MAC lengths other than 128 (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: Importing self-identifying JWKs (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: W3C Web Crypto WG - moving to github in the future ? (Thursday, 13 February)
• Removing SHA-224 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: Algorithm aliasing and JWK algorithm names (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: EC Point Representations (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-44 and ISSUE-46 (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: will the key reference available sent via postMessage? (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: Key Ownership and SOP exception (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: Current status of pre-Last Call bugs (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: To wrap or to wrapKey ?? (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: Registered algorithm vs supported algorithm (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: AES-KW can only wrap a JWK key if its serialization happens to be 8*n bytes long (Saturday, 1 February)

Vijay Bharadwaj

• RE: Consider whether the others Public Value input to (EC)DH deriveKey should be a Key object (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: inconsistent references for HKDF-CTR (Thursday, 27 February)
• RE: Define how keys are derived from secret values for deriveKey (Wednesday, 26 February)
• RE: SPKI export needs additional parameter (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Support optional private value length for DH PKCS#3 ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Support optional private value length for DH PKCS#3 ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
• RE: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: Bug # 24410 - AES CTR descriptions (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: W3C Web Crypto WG - progressing on ISSUE-36 (Monday, 24 February)
• RE: AES CFB input parameter "s" (Monday, 24 February)

조상래

• RE: WebCrypto @ Korea WWW2014 - need help/talks (Monday, 24 February)

Last message date: Friday, 28 February 2014 20:26:28 UTC