- From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:46:10 +0100
- To: Bruno Oliveira <abstractj@redhat.com>, Daniel McDonald <daniel@cx.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- CC: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>, Alexey Proskuryakov <ap@webkit.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
For once, having my gemalto hat : we have no problem to remove it. Regards, Virginie -----Original Message----- From: Bruno Oliveira [mailto:abstractj@redhat.com] Sent: jeudi 13 février 2014 18:41 To: Daniel McDonald; Ryan Sleevi Cc: Richard Barnes; Israel Hilerio; public-webcrypto@w3.org; Alexey Proskuryakov; Harry Halpin Subject: Re: Removing SHA-224 I think they unfortunately did that because of the legacy systems outside there :/ I still vote to remove it. -- abstractj JBoss, a division of Red Hat On February 13, 2014 at 3:08:37 PM, Ryan Sleevi (sleevi@google.com) wrote: > > > It appears they are doing so absent use-cases or compelling reason, > and merely doing it for completion sake. > > > I would like to avoid that, if possible. > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a transmitted virus
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 17:46:55 UTC