public-webauthn@w3.org from January 2019 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Benjamin VanderSloot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) David Waite via GitHub

Wednesday, 30 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) =JeffH via GitHub
• Proposed Face to Face WebAuthn WG level 2 Kickoff Anthony Nadalin

Tuesday, 29 January 2019

• Upcoming press activity opportunities open to W3C Members Coralie Mercier
• [webauthn] Add notion of forbidding resident credential creation (#1149) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) =JeffH via GitHub

Monday, 28 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) Emil Lundberg
• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) Jeff Hodges
• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Saturday, 26 January 2019

• [webauthn] TPM attestation format & EdDSA & hash alg (#1148) Tangui via GitHub

Friday, 25 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Benjamin VanderSloot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Benjamin VanderSloot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Benjamin VanderSloot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Benjamin VanderSloot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Thursday, 24 January 2019

• [webauthn] add notion of "enterprise" attestation (#1147) =JeffH via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] Make appid extension always return true (#1144) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make appid extension always return true (#1144) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose extension: Delegation of Authentication (#1125) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Lack of support for modern ECC (#1124) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add None attestation case to RP ops registration step 16 (#1145) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add None attestation case to RP ops registration step 16 (#1145) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make appid extension always return true (#1144) Mike Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Fix android-safetynet trust path (#1142) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Fix android-safetynet trust path (#1142) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (#1141) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Tagged the Proposed Rec commit in master branch (was: [w3c/webauthn] Jeff Hodges
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH =JeffH via GitHub

Tuesday, 22 January 2019

• 01/23/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• Re: [webauthn] undefined terms and terms we really ought to define (#462) =JeffH via GitHub

Thursday, 17 January 2019

• Using a smart phone as an authenticator with WebAuthn Vikas Tandon

Friday, 18 January 2019

• [webauthn] Maybe upgrade user handle PII prohibition to a MUST (#1146) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (#1141) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add None attestation case to RP ops registration step 16 Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 109165: Add None attestation case to RP ops registration s... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Make appid extension always return true Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 20f027: Make appid extension always return true GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Determine appid extension output after authenticator returns Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 776b7b: Determine appid extension output after authenticat... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] spec is missing baseline posture that credential source is bound to a particular authenticator (#1122) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix android-safetynet trust path Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] e09147: Fix android-safetynet trust path GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Recommend minimal basic attestation batches (#1141) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Recommend minimal basic attestation batches Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a81b7e: Recommend minimal basic attestation batches GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d9de12: Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenti... GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenticator operations Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 08a088: Let requireUserPresence always be true in authenti... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Thursday, 17 January 2019

• Re: WebAuthn and Credential Management Jeff Hodges
• Re: [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn and Credential Management Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• [webauthn] Redirected Icon Validation (#1139) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• [webauthn] update editor's draft to link to newly published Prop Rec (#1138) =JeffH via GitHub
• [webauthn] update @equalJeffH's affiliation (#1137) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn and Credential Management Jeff Hodges
• Re: WebAuthn and Credential Management Jeff Hodges
• Re: WebAuthn is a Proposed Recommendation Anthony Nadalin
• [webauthn] RP ops registration step 16 is missing a case for None attestation (#1136) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• WebAuthn is a Proposed Recommendation Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer android-safetynet verification to SafetyNet documentation? (#1135) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Refer android-safetynet verification to SafetyNet documentation? (#1135) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn and Credential Management Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Arnar Birgisson via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: WebAuthn and Credential Management Mike West
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Lack of support for modern ECC (#1124) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] dfecb2: Built by Travis-CI: c610a95ac555ea86bb8eb52640b947... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b42d87: Built by Travis-CI: c610a95ac555ea86bb8eb52640b947... GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] SafetyNet response as an extension (#1011) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c610a9: Use RFC2119 for defined extensions (#1134) GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Use RFC2119 for defined extensions Mike Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued Mike Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Use RFC2119 for defined extensions (#1134) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] SafetyNet Attestation Clarifications (#968) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Indicate resident key credential "preferred" during registration and find out what the authenticator offered (#991) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No way to verify requireResidentKey during registration step at RP side (#1060) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Use RFC2119 for defined extensions Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d97d2e: Use RFC2119 for defined extensions GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by plehegar Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f32a8e: Use RFC2119 for defined extensions GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by plehegar Philippe Le Hegaret via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose SafetyNet as an extension (#1010) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Propose SafetyNet as an extension Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Propose SafetyNet as an extension (#1010) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add "Webauthn Authenticator" definition alias (#1130) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) ToruAoyagi via GitHub
• [webauthn] add explanatory note to step 3 in authenticatorMakeCredential Operation (#1133) =JeffH via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 January 2019

• 01/16/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda Anthony Nadalin
• [webauthn] Is android-safetynet attestation trust path limited to one cert? (#1132) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Monday, 14 January 2019

• WebAuthn and Credential Management Philippe Le Hégaret
• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Sunday, 13 January 2019

• Re: [webauthn] How do I use a smart phone as an authenticator when the web application is running on a laptop/desktop? (#954) Gorka Lerchundi Osa via GitHub

Friday, 11 January 2019

• Re: Transition Request: Web Authentication to Proposed Recommendation Philippe Le Hégaret
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add examples of authenticator types to Authenticator definition Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add "Webauthn Authenticator" definition alias Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO Authenticators (#1128) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO Authenticators (#1128) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO Authenticators (#1128) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Replaced WebAuthn authenticator with FIDO2 authenticator Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO2 Authenticators (#1128) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO2 Authenticators (#1128) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO2 Authenticators (#1128) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn Authenticators are FIDO2 Authenticators (#1128) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Roland Atoui via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Replaced WebAuthn authenticator with FIDO2 authenticator Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [webauthn] There is no such thing as WebAuthn Authenticators (#1128) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [webauthn] Attestation privacy advice creates large scale security risks (#1127) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub

Thursday, 10 January 2019

• RE: web-platform-tests results Akshay Kumar

Wednesday, 9 January 2019

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Document wide review (#106) Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: In safetynet attestation "nonce" is base64, not base64url J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Leap of Faith not only for Self and None Attestation Types (#1088) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Rewrite security consideration on attestation and MitM attacks (#1095) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] spec is missing baseline posture that credential source is bound to a particular authenticator (#1122) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Note that appid should be set to the previously used AppID (#1118) J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by WebAuthnBot WebAuthnBot via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix typo in credential registration steps J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Singularize a "Relying Parties'" to "Relying Party's" J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by jcjones J.C. Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by selfissued Mike Jones via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Clarify user identification in RP assertion verification operation Mike Jones via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Clarify which user to authenticate if userHandle is not present (#1078) Mike Jones via GitHub
• 01/09/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda Anthony Nadalin

Tuesday, 1 January 2019

• 01/02/2019 W3C Web Authentication WG Meeting Agenda - CANCELLED Anthony Nadalin

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2019 16:40:48 UTC