Tuesday, 28 June 2005
- Summary of ERT WG Meeting on Tuesday 28 June, 2005
- [Fwd: [ERT] http request/response]
- Regrets RE: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 28 June 2005
- Re Regrets: Today's meet
- Today's meet
Monday, 27 June 2005
Saturday, 25 June 2005
Friday, 24 June 2005
Wednesday, 22 June 2005
Tuesday, 21 June 2005
- Re: Minutes for Teleconference on 21 June, 2005
- Re: HiSoftware Components for Flash MX 2004
- Re: HiSoftware Components for Flash MX 2004
- Minutes for Teleconference on 21 June, 2005
- Proposal Re: usingTool - not a property of Assertor?
Monday, 20 June 2005
- Re: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 21 June 2005
- Re: Does TestCase belong in EARL
- Re: Does TestCase belong in EARL
- Re: Does TestCase belong in EARL
- Re: Does TestCase belong in EARL
- ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 21 June 2005
- Does TestCase belong in EARL
Saturday, 18 June 2005
Friday, 17 June 2005
- Re: Date / time of evaluation
- Re: Date / time of evaluation
- Re: Namespace, Versioning Re: the Tool class
- Re: Date / time of evaluation
- Re: usingTool - not a property of Assertor?
- Re: Date / time of evaluation
- Re: Date / time of evaluation
- Re: Namespace, Versioning Re: the Tool class
Thursday, 16 June 2005
- Re: Date / time of evaluation
- Date / time of evaluation
- Namespace, Versioning Re: the Tool class
- Re: Versioning the Tool class
Wednesday, 15 June 2005
Tuesday, 14 June 2005
Monday, 13 June 2005
- RE: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 14 June 2005
- Transition Request: First Public Working Draft of the "Requirements for the Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0"
- ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 14 June 2005
Friday, 10 June 2005
- Re: Multiple versions of tools Re: EARL Schema
- Multiple versions of tools Re: EARL Schema
- foaf identifiers Re: EARL Schema
- Re: EARL Schema resorted and with OWL constraints
- Re: EARL Schema resorted and with OWL constraints
- Re: EARL Schema resorted and with OWL constraints
- Re: EARL Schema resorted and with OWL constraints
Thursday, 9 June 2005
- EARL Schema resorted and with OWL constraints
- Discussion about earl:confidence so far
- Re: Minutes for Teleconference on 7 June, 2005
- Re: Minutes for Teleconference on 7 June, 2005
- Re: RDF document?
Tuesday, 7 June 2005
- Minutes for Teleconference on 7 June, 2005
- Re: Against test 9 (d-links)
- Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements
- Re: Against test 9 (d-links)
- Re: Against test 9 (d-links)
- Re: Against test 9 (d-links)
- Re: [Updated] ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 7 June 2005
- About tests 37-41 (headers)
- About test 13 (client side image-maps)
- Against test 9 (d-links)
- Re: [Moderator Action] Comment: 23. XHTML Metainformation Attributes Module
- Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements
- Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements
- Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements
Monday, 6 June 2005
- Very likely regrets for tonight
- Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements
- Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements
- [Updated] ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 7 June 2005
- ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 7 June 2005
- EARL 1.0 Requirements
Sunday, 5 June 2005
Friday, 3 June 2005
Thursday, 2 June 2005
- Re: WCAG formalization (rewriting WCAG HTML techniques as automatable rules)
- Re: WCAG formalization (rewriting WCAG HTML techniques as automatable rules)
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Verbose reporting
- Re: Verbose reporting
- Verbose reporting
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: WCAG formalization (rewriting WCAG HTML techniques as automatable rules)
Wednesday, 1 June 2005
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- WCAG formalization (rewriting WCAG HTML techniques as automatable rules)
- RE: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- [Fwd: RE: Confidence Claims - more discussion]
- RE: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- RE: Confidence Claims - more discussion
- Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion