- From: Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:26:53 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Charles McCN <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:32:10 UTC
> By the way, there are various groups working on WCAG 1.0 conformance - for > example because they have a major windows 95 market, or something similar. If > you happen to develop a test for something you think is no longer relevant, > it is probably worth publishing it anyway... > > cheers > > Chaals Anyway the example at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test9.html still contradicts http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-HTML-TECHS/#linktext (provide useful link text). If there are several images we could have several d-links, i.e, links that share the same text (a "D") but point to different targets. If I supported that test (I don't), I would improve the example by adding a mandatory title attribute to every d-link. So, another question is what should we do with an "accepted" test which is based on a "deprecated" technique. Vicente Luque Centeno Dep. Ingeniería Telemática Universidad Carlos III de Madrid http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:32:10 UTC