Re: EARL 1.0 Requirements from Charles McCN on 2005-06-07 (public-wai-ert@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Charles McCN <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:57:36 +0200
To: shadi@w3.org, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.srx9u0h1wuwgra@researchsft.orange-hotspot.com>

On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 11:57:34 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> Ref:  
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20050615.html>

I think that the requirement for machine processing in reasonable time  
should be a should, since "reasonable time" is not exactly well specified.

I also think the "Status of this Document" section should say something  
about what the future of the document is expected to be (update schedule,  
what it is meant to end up as).

Neither of these strike me as a good reason to hold back publication of a  
draft, so I am happy to sign off on this as is, or with either or both of  
the above amendments, given that we can edit it still.

cheers

Chaals

Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 05:58:18 UTC