Re: OWL Restrictions

Hi,

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> The caridinality stuff for dc:date makes sense. There seems to me 
> little  poiint in saying that it is possible to have a dc:isPartOf 
> property - it  is possible to have any RDF you want.

Good point. My intention was to say "if there is a dc:isPartOf, then it needs to point from one TestSubject to another" (tools are not *expected* to process any other uses of dc:isPartOf, of course they may).


> (BTW thanks for doing this - it is one of my action items that was  
> outstanding :-)

It's not over yet ;)
You (or anyone else on the list) are welcome to continue developing this idea...

Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 

Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 19:14:26 UTC