- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:39:59 +0200
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, shadi@w3.org, public-wai-ert@w3.org
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:02:30 +0200, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote: > "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org> >> Would this mean the date on the Web content would become obsolete >> or at least optional? I doubt there are many cases when the content is >> captured then tested at a (significantly) different time. What do >> people think? > > I think optional, and we should lean towards not the date it was > captured but the last-modified date of the web-content? or should we > just include that as a last-modified property of it? I think it is helpful information, but I am not so concerned about making it required. last-modified may or may not be useful info, since servers are not always particularly accurate, so the date of capture may also have value. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Here's one we prepared earlier: http://www.opera.com/download
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 11:40:16 UTC