- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:39:59 +0200
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>, shadi@w3.org, public-wai-ert@w3.org
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:02:30 +0200, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote:
> "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
>> Would this mean the date on the Web content would become obsolete
>> or at least optional? I doubt there are many cases when the content is
>> captured then tested at a (significantly) different time. What do
>> people think?
>
> I think optional, and we should lean towards not the date it was
> captured but the last-modified date of the web-content? or should we
> just include that as a last-modified property of it?
I think it is helpful information, but I am not so concerned about making
it required. last-modified may or may not be useful info, since servers
are not always particularly accurate, so the date of capture may also have
value.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
Here's one we prepared earlier: http://www.opera.com/download
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 11:40:16 UTC