Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html
Fwd: Restarting the W3C Process Task Force -- The Procedures the AB is Using in Revising the W3C Process Document
Membership question
- Ian Jacobs (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Jeff Jaffe (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Arthur Barstow (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Jeff Jaffe (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Brian Kardell (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Ian Jacobs (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Brian Kardell (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Ian Jacobs (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Brian Kardell (Tuesday, 8 July)
New draft of Process available
Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]]
- David Singer (Thursday, 31 July)
- Wayne Carr (Friday, 18 July)
- Chris Wilson (Friday, 18 July)
- Daniel Appelquist (Friday, 18 July)
- GALINDO Virginie (Friday, 18 July)
- Stephen Zilles (Friday, 18 July)
- Chris Wilson (Thursday, 17 July)
- Arthur Barstow (Thursday, 17 July)
- GALINDO Virginie (Thursday, 17 July)
- Bassetti, Ann (Friday, 11 July)
- Bassetti, Ann (Friday, 11 July)
- Arthur Barstow (Friday, 11 July)
- GALINDO Virginie (Friday, 11 July)
- Arthur Barstow (Friday, 11 July)
Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015)
Voting experiment
w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]
- Arthur Barstow (Friday, 11 July)
- Marc Braner (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Charles McCathie Nevile (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Chris Wilson (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Arthur Barstow (Wednesday, 9 July)
- David Singer (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) (Wednesday, 9 July)
- David Singer (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Nottingham, Mark (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Jeff Jaffe (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Nottingham, Mark (Wednesday, 9 July)
- Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) (Tuesday, 8 July)
- Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 8 July)
w3process-ISSUE-105: Please ensure PatPol / Process "binding" described as normative. [Patent Policy]
Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2014 23:25:27 UTC