- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 10:33:20 -0400
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: public-w3process@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53BD52B0.7040709@w3.org>
On 7/9/2014 9:53 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > > On Jul 9, 2014 9:35 AM, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org <mailto:ij@w3.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > And what % of w3c funding comes from membership fees? > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > Before I continue to look up data, can you let me know what you wish > to determine? > > > > Ian > > > > -- > > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org <mailto:ij@w3.org>> > http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > > Basically, what is worth suggesting in terms of changes (including > "webizen"). I'd like to have at least some basic data points to make > sure anything we suggest is practical - it's very hard to offer any > kind of input without basic data. It would be nice if there was some > kind of simple public summary, but from what I've found, there really > isn't. Membership has a cost, the cost of membership limits who can be > a member. Participation has a cost, the cost also affects > participation. And somewhere, all this income is spent - on what? Is > it enough? Too much? Too little? It's very hard to make anything > remotely like a convincing argument if you can't understand the > general problem space. My sense is that there are some fundamental > questions on the ab priority list re: this and I'd like to contribute > to the conversation with a basic degree of intelligence. > I'm not sure I understand the linkage between the webizen idea and this data. At a micro level, you might be interested in our fee schedule http://www.w3.org/Consortium/fees which indicates the participation costs as a function of company size and country. At a macro level, the vast majority of our funding comes from Member fees. There is a double digit component that comes from government research projects - but that funding is used to support to the government contract - not used to support working groups (although I believe it helps the working groups). So, substantially 100% of Member fees goes to support direct Working Group activity; indirect support of Working Groups (e.g. Communications, Systems Support), and basic operations of the consortium (e.g. business development and management).
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 14:33:31 UTC