Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]]

On 7/8/14 10:53 AM, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker 
wrote:
> w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/104
>
> Raised by: Arthur Barstow
> On product: Advisory Board
>
> It appears the only e-mail list used by the Advisory Board is a private list that is not accessible to Members nor Public. That list should be used exclusively for "sensitive" information and all other AB e-mail should be moved to a Public list (preferable by me) or at least a Member-only list.

Dear AB,

Apparently, some of you are not subscribed to public-w3process [given 
the AB's #1 priority is presumably the upkeep of W3C processes, that 
seems like a bug, albeit the subject for a different thread]. As such, 
in case you missed it, I raised an issue re AB transparency [1] and it 
was discussed in thread [2].

In [3], I proposed the AB create a new Public list that could be used 
for things such as gathering input on AB priorities. Apparently, I was 
supposed to send that proposal to the AB's private list. Does anyone 
object to creating a new Public list for the AB (the strawman proposal 
for the list name is "public-ab")?

-Thanks, AB

[1] <http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/104>
[2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Jul/0001.html>
[3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2014Jul/0012.html>

Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 13:20:57 UTC