public-sml@w3.org from March 2008 by thread

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-27 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Tuesday, 25 March)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-31 to 2008-04-02 SML F2F John Arwe (Tuesday, 25 March)

[w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-03-20 Teleconference minutes Wilson, Kirk D (Friday, 21 March)

Cleaned-up version of the EPR Scheme Note Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 19 March)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-20 SML John Arwe (Wednesday, 19 March)

SML References John Arwe (Tuesday, 18 March)

Draft proposal fro EPR Note: Issue 5341 Wilson, Kirk D (Tuesday, 18 March)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-03-013 SML Telecon Sandy Gao (Monday, 17 March)

[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 March)

[Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5532] The previous-draft links are out of date bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5529] Calrify Appendix C bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 March)

[Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 March)

[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 March)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 March)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 March)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 March)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 March)

[Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 10 March)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-13 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Monday, 10 March)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-03-06 SML Telecon Jordan Boucher (Saturday, 8 March)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 March)

[Bug 5501] LC publication related editorial fixes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

EPR TAG NOTE Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5529] Calrify Appendix C bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 March)

SML EPR Reference Scheme Note Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 6 March)

[w3c sml][agenda] [v2] 2008-03-06 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 March)

[Bug 5532] The previous-draft links are out of date bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

RE: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1 Philippe Le Hegaret (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5529] Calrify Appendix C bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5521] The term "URI scheme" is confusing bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 March)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-03-06 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Tuesday, 4 March)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-01-21 SML F2F Sandy Gao (Tuesday, 4 March)

W3C SML and SML-IF 1.1 - Last Call for Review and Comments Pratul Dublish (Monday, 3 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 25 March 2008 17:06:12 UTC