- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:51:36 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5513 ------- Comment #3 from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk 2008-03-12 15:51 ------- Sandy's reply answers a part of the question, namely why sml:ref is necessary (I'm not convinced by his argument, but that's a separate question). He doesn't address the part of the question I care about: why _can't_ I use SML to validate my document collections which use simple xlinks?
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:51:42 UTC