- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:53:42 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5527
Summary: Why is NCName optional?
Product: SML
Version: LC
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
Minor comment from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html
4.5.1.2: Since XML Schema uses XPath 1.0 rules for names, surely the
NCName: isn't optional, it _must_ be present, and in any case, it
should be stated that there must be an NS Binding for that prefix to
the SML namespace in scope.
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:53:52 UTC