- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:53:42 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5527 Summary: Why is NCName optional? Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org Minor comment from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html 4.5.1.2: Since XML Schema uses XPath 1.0 rules for names, surely the NCName: isn't optional, it _must_ be present, and in any case, it should be stated that there must be an NS Binding for that prefix to the SML namespace in scope.
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:53:52 UTC