- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:33:23 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 Summary: SML URI seems overconstrained Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org CC: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk >From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0002.html 3) The SMLURI thing seems overconstrained---why not just say it's a URI and be done with it? What is gained by saying that e.g. http//www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-sml-20080114/#abstract is _not_ an SMLURI? I reckon that's going to be _hugely_ confusing to users.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 01:33:33 UTC