- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:33:23 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5543
Summary: SML URI seems overconstrained
Product: SML
Version: LC
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
CC: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0002.html
3) The SMLURI thing seems overconstrained---why not just say it's a URI
and be done with it? What is gained by saying that
e.g. http//www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-sml-20080114/#abstract is _not_ an
SMLURI? I reckon that's going to be _hugely_ confusing to users.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 01:33:33 UTC