- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:38:44 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5546
Summary: Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
Product: SML
Version: LC
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Interchange Format
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
CC: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html
Note I have only skimmed the SML Interchange Format document, which I couldn't
really get my head around and on which I have no comment to make,
except that it appears to be largely duplicating the work of RFC 2557,
and they should either abandon SML-IF and use multipart/related per
that RFC, or explain why they haven't done so.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 01:38:52 UTC