- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:38:44 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5546 Summary: Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org CC: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk >From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0001.html Note I have only skimmed the SML Interchange Format document, which I couldn't really get my head around and on which I have no comment to make, except that it appears to be largely duplicating the work of RFC 2557, and they should either abandon SML-IF and use multipart/related per that RFC, or explain why they haven't done so.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 01:38:52 UTC