- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:30:55 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5541
Summary: Why is schema-less identification of reference elements
important?
Product: SML
Version: LC
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
CC: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0002.html
Why is "schema-less
identification of reference elements" important, when schema
validity assessment is a fundamental part of model validation? Or,
even more strongly, if this spec. is _really_ about allowing people
to express link integrity conditions on collections of documents,
why can't I use it to do the most obvious and simple of integrity
checks, that is, check that all the links in my XHTML document
resolve? It would be easy, and arguably cleaner, to annotate
schemas with sml:ref instead of instances!
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 01:31:04 UTC