- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:30:55 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5541 Summary: Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: pratul.dublish@microsoft.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org CC: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk >From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Mar/0002.html Why is "schema-less identification of reference elements" important, when schema validity assessment is a fundamental part of model validation? Or, even more strongly, if this spec. is _really_ about allowing people to express link integrity conditions on collections of documents, why can't I use it to do the most obvious and simple of integrity checks, that is, check that all the links in my XHTML document resolve? It would be easy, and arguably cleaner, to annotate schemas with sml:ref instead of instances!
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 01:31:04 UTC