Thursday, 30 August 2007
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
- Re: an idea -- using different literal classes for each datatype
- RIF WG minutes from August 28 telecon
- Re: an idea -- using different literal classes for each datatype
Tuesday, 28 August 2007
- Re: an idea -- using different literal classes for each datatype
- ACTION-338 - JAXB
- Re: an idea -- using different literal classes for each datatype
- Re: more on XML syntax -- schema
- Re: more on XML syntax -- schema
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- Re: towards a resolution on RIF BLD classification
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- Re: towards a resolution on RIF BLD classification
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- Re: towards a resolution on RIF BLD classification
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 28 August
Monday, 27 August 2007
- Re: RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- an idea -- using different literal classes for each datatype
- Register / Regrets for RIF Meeting in September (F2F7)
- more on XML syntax -- schema
- towards a resolution on RIF BLD classification
Friday, 24 August 2007
Thursday, 23 August 2007
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
- RIF Minutes for 21-Aug-07-rif-minutes.html
- RE: presenting data models in RIF
- Re: presenting data models in RIF
- RE: presenting data models in RIF
Tuesday, 21 August 2007
Monday, 20 August 2007
Sunday, 19 August 2007
Friday, 17 August 2007
Thursday, 16 August 2007
- Re: presenting data models in RIF
- Re: presenting data models in RIF
- presenting data models in RIF
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- RE: fulfilment of my action of today <-- Rumblings on why we need classification terms in RIF (and why RDF's vocab should not be used)
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- Re: fulfilment of my action of today <-- Rumblings on why we need classification terms in RIF (and why RDF's vocab should not be used)
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- RE: fulfilment of my action of today <-- Rumblings on why we need classification terms in RIF (and why RDF's vocab should not be used)
- Re: fulfilment of my action of today <-- Rumblings on why we need classification terms in RIF (and why RDF's vocab should not be used)
- Re: fulfilment of my action of today
- Re: Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- Re: fulfilment of my action of today <-- Rumblings on why we need classification terms in RIF (and why RDF's vocab should not be used)
Wednesday, 15 August 2007
- Friendly amendment to rif:subClassOf
- RE: fulfilment of my action of today <-- Rumblings on why we need classification terms in RIF (and why RDF's vocab should not be used)
- [Admin] draft minutes of call 14-Aug-07
- Re: fulfilment of my action of today
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
- fulfilment of my action of today
- [UCR] Action 159: Translating UC6 Cases into RIF Core
- [BLD] RIF-RDF combination
- status of basic rif logic document
Monday, 13 August 2007
Tuesday, 7 August 2007
Friday, 3 August 2007
- Re: classification as subset of RDFS axioms
- Re: RIF-BLD Classification
- Re: RIF-BLD Classification
- RE: UCR discussion at next telecon
- UCR discussion at next telecon
- classification as subset of RDFS axioms
- Re: RIF-BLD Classification
- RIF-BLD Classification