- From: David Z. Hirtle <david.hirtle@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:36:30 -0400
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
After a quick glance, the generated XML schema looks pretty good from my end. There are a few organizational changes I might suggest for later versions, though... e.g., merging And__formula, Or__formula and Exists__formula, which are identical. I can also confirm that XSV likes it. David On 8/27/07, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > > > Here's a slightly revised version of the RIF example document I sent on > Friday: > http://www.w3.org/2007/08/rif-absyn/eg7.rif > > Here's a machine-generated Relax-NG schema for BLD which works for that > document: > http://www.w3.org/2007/08/rif-absyn/bld.rnc > > Here's the trang-generated XML Schema version of it: > http://www.w3.org/2007/08/rif-absyn/bld.xsd > > The W3C XML Schema validator (http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv) > says it's okay. > > Gary -- can you try it with JAXB, and see how sane the results are? > > Here's the ASN I used -- it's modified from the bits in the BLD draft in > ways I talked about in Friday's e-mail: > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2007/asn/test-data/bld.asn?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > Here's the code I used to generate the rnc, in Python: > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2007/asn/absyn.py?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > -- Sandro > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 13:36:42 UTC