- From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 01:11:07 -0700
- To: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 08:11:57 UTC
Please find attached draft minutes for this week's call. Executive summary: 1. Use cases: everyone should review. 2. Discussion on BLD-RDF compatibility: this may be lite in the minutes as the scribe was lost by about sentence 2 of Jos' proposal. Further discussion likely via email. Main issue seems to be whether some subset of RDFS is best for RIF, or not. 2. Discussion on BLD-Frames: mostly around scope of RIF per the "subclass" construct and whether the semantics of subclass should be inherited from the donor data/object model or explicitly defined in RIF. Discussion continued in emails. Errata: A. Some missing names per Zakim. B. Possibly the generated action was wrong (per scribe snafu). Paul Vincent TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 08:11:57 UTC