- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:59:35 +0100
- To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: >> Michael Kifer wrote: >>> Following up on the issue of whether RIF needs its own subclassOf thingie, >>> I would argue that in order to support exchange of data models (strongly >>> argued for by Gary and, as I understood at the last f2f, favored by >>> Christian) >> and objected to by me as being out of scope of RIF > > Not clear how you determined that. Others seem to feel it is not out of scope. The chairs were crystal clear at the last f2f that RIF is not supposed to create yet another W3C data modelling language, it even got written on the flip chart. Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Friday, 17 August 2007 09:59:54 UTC