public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from January 2025 by author

Adrian Gschwend

• Re: Is there a meeting today? (Thursday, 2 January)

Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Wednesday, 29 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 2 January)
• Event Canceled: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 2 January)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Saturday, 25 January)
• Re: Review of RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Review of RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Review of RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Time management (Friday, 3 January)

Bob DuCharme

• [rdf12-concepts] notes on 2025-01-17 RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Syntax WD (Monday, 20 January)

ddooss@wp.pl

• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Time management (Saturday, 4 January)

Doerthe Arndt

• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)

Franconi Enrico

• Unifying the discussion on *unstar* and related topics (Friday, 31 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star Semantics TF (Thursday, 30 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star Semantics TF (Thursday, 23 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star Semantics TF (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Review of RDF Concepts (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Semantics TF: 'weak' transparency and entailments driven by reification (Tuesday, 14 January)
• RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Monday, 13 January)
• Event Updated: RDF-star Semantics TF (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 2 January)
• Re: Is there a meeting today? (Thursday, 2 January)
• Is there a meeting today? (Thursday, 2 January)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Time management (Friday, 3 January)

Gregory Williams

• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)

James Anderson

• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Review of RDF Concepts (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Review of RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Review of RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 15 January)

Lassila, Ora

• Re: Is there a meeting today? (Thursday, 2 January)

Niklas Lindström

• Review of RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)

Olaf Hartig

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 22 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Wednesday, 29 January)
• review of RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: Semantics TF: 'weak' transparency and entailments driven by reification (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Semantics TF: 'weak' transparency and entailments driven by reification (Tuesday, 14 January)
• RDFS entailments of the empty graph (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: Question on CR issues (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Commenting on PRs (Friday, 17 January)
• RDF-Concept review (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Friday, 17 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)

Ruben Taelman

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 30 January)

Sasaki, Felix

• AW: Question on CR issues (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Question on CR issues (Tuesday, 21 January)
• AW: Commenting on PRs (Sunday, 19 January)
• AW: Time management (Monday, 6 January)

Souripriya Das

• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Monday, 27 January)
• Re: [External] : Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Friday, 24 January)
• Can a triple-term in an N-Triple 1.2 statement have "infinite" number of atomic terms? (Thursday, 23 January)

Thomas Lörtsch

• Re: Commenting on PRs (Monday, 20 January)
• Review of RDF 1.2 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Thursday, 16 January)
• Re: Semantics TF: 'weak' transparency and entailments driven by reification (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Semantics TF: 'weak' transparency and entailments driven by reification (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Semantics TF: 'weak' transparency and entailments driven by reification (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Friday, 10 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Thursday, 9 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Wednesday, 8 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Monday, 6 January)
• Re: Is there a meeting today? (Thursday, 2 January)

William Van Woensel

• Re: RDF / RDFS semantics for the liberal baseline (Monday, 20 January)
• Re: Decision from the Semantics TF: liberal baseline (Tuesday, 7 January)

Last message date: Friday, 31 January 2025 17:35:24 UTC