- From: Sasaki, Felix <felix.sasaki@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:05:03 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AS8PR02MB69665FF2D45F57A5473CF90185E62@AS8PR02MB6966.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Hi all, I looked at this list https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20label%3Ams%3ACR%20 and have a few questions. 1) https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/139 (Merge unstar mapping) The proposed section is marked as non normative, so it would not be relevant for CR. There is a remark in the PR on having this normative or not. What is the intent? If this would be normative, how would tests for this look like? 2) https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/138 (triple terms in subject position) How would a test for this look like? 3) https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/129 (distinguish RDF data model from abstract syntax) How would a test for this look like? 4) https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/128 (upgrade to graph isomorphism) How would a test for this look like? 5) https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/116 (rdf:json value space incorrect) This discussion seems to be blocked. Could we clarify in the group if we can move on without unanimity? See the mail from PA at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2025Jan/0112.html and https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#Consensus * Felix
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2025 10:05:09 UTC