Re: Review of RDF Concepts

there are other aspects of the document which would benefit from editorial changes.

3.3 LITERALS

the descriptions should be consolidated rather than split between the enumerating list and the subsequent paragraphs.
the document would be easier to read and understand if each descriptive item paragraph is complete.
the description of the zero case should be introduced in the initial paragraph and folded into the enumerating list.

4.NOTE

SPARQL 1.1 Query Language allows RDF Graphs to be identified using an IRI only.

best regards, from berlin,

> On 15. Jan 2025, at 18:36, James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> in section 3.3, the modification to replace MUST with SHOULD in this passage
> 
>> Implementations SHOULD accept ill-typed literals and produce RDF graphs from them.
>> 
> should be reverted.
> 
>> On 15. Jan 2025, at 14:59, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> My review:
>> 
>> https://gist.github.com/afs/f71020019fc33b4ded3e105339c6a655
>> 
>>   Andy
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---
> james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
> 
> 

---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2025 18:29:36 UTC