from October to December 2010 by subject

(r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF] PLEASE NOTE!!

[Bug 10149] [polyglot] i18n comment 1 : UTF-16 BOM is required

[Bug 10150] [polyglot] i18n comment 2 : In-document declarations always useful

[Bug 10151] [polyglot] i18n comment 4 : Omit the either/or list

[Bug 10152] [polyglot] i18n comment 5 : Mention lang and xml:lang

[Bug 10153] [polyglot] i18n comment 6 : Case requirements

[Bug 10154] [polyglot] i18n comment 7 : Named entity references

[Bug 10155] [polyglot] i18n comment 8 : ployglot

[Bug 10156] [polyglot] i18n comment 3 : BOM with utf-8 and/or utf-16

[Bug 10818] i18n comment 14 : title and alt attribute direction and two new attributes: titledir and altdir

[Bug 10829] i18n comment : ruby code samples

[Bug 10890] i18n comment : Allow utf-16 meta encoding declarations

[Bug 9434] precedence between charset and http-equiv

[css3-text] 'First letter' delimitation

[css3-text] New Working Draft

[widget] proposal to add defaultlocale attribute to widget element (P&C Spec), was Re: [widgets] Span example

Added 'locale' to Text, Keyboard, and Composition Events [ISSUE-119]

anyURI in W3C XML Schema 1.1

Comment on Widget Interface...

css3-text- Indic Inputs

Fwd: Added 'locale' to Text, Keyboard, and Composition Events [ISSUE-119]

Fwd: RFC 6067 on BCP 47 Extension U

HTML5 comments tables

i18n comments on Polyglot Markup [issue #4]

i18n LC comments on WOFF

i18n Polyglot Markup/attr values (6th issue)

i18n Polyglot Markup/BOM+UTF8 (3rd issue)

i18n Polyglot Markup/in-doc encoding declarations (2nd issue)

i18n Polyglot Markup/NCRs (7th issue)

i18n Polyglot Markup/xml:lang+lang (5th issue)

i18n-ISSUE-1 (RI): Test issue

i18n-ISSUE-2 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF]

I18N-ISSUE-6: Localization mechanism too restricted [WOFF]

I18N-ISSUE-7: Paragraphs and inline content [WOFF]

I18N-ISSUE-8: Direction attributes needed [WOFF]

I18N-ISSUE-9: OpenType feature preservation [WOFF]

Internationalization Core Working Group-ISSUE-4: Language tag references [WOFF]

ISSUE (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF] PLEASE NOTE!!

ISSUE-1 (RI): Test issue

ISSUE-2 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF]

ISSUE-2 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF] PLEASE NOTE!!

ISSUE-3 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF]

ISSUE-5: Use of attributes for human readable text [WOFF]

More WOFF issues

Seeking feedback on Widget Interface: LocalizableString

text/keyboard event input locale - status

WOFF comments sent

WOFF review needed

Last message date: Monday, 27 December 2010 13:43:30 UTC