Monday, 29 April 2013
- [Bug 21872] New: Clarify what poster frame means.
- Re: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- [Bug 21866] New: modify header and footer aria info
- Re: addition of <main> to HTML 5.0
- Re: addition of <main> to HTML 5.0
- Re: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- RE: addition of <main> to HTML 5.0
Sunday, 28 April 2013
Friday, 26 April 2013
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- [Bug 21851] New: revert removal of text and getCueAsHTML members; address constructor changes
- Re: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- Re: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- Re: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Re: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- RE: Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Agenda Item for next F2F - Reverting changes to TextTrackCue in master branch
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Re: TextTrack API changes
- Re: TextTrack API changes
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
- Re: Next steps for Microdata
- RE: Next steps for Microdata
- [Bug 21818] New: XHTML5: Permit <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
- Next steps for Microdata
- [Bug 21810] New: Example document not conforming
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
- [Bug 21807] New: Shepherd Ruby Extension Spec to FPWD
- [Bug 21781] New: Say that resolving of relative longdesc URLs is affected by <base> (and @xml:base)
- [Bug 21778] New: Define a user experience for when the @longdesc is the empty string
Monday, 22 April 2013
- [Bug 21773] New: [HTML]: "Status of This document" text please improve it
- Re: added a file a bug script to html 5.1
- added a file a bug script to html 5.1
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
Sunday, 21 April 2013
- RE: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- FW: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
Friday, 19 April 2013
Thursday, 18 April 2013
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- RE: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- RE: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Re: Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
- Formal objection to the marking of bug 21727 as invalid.
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- [Bug 21721] New: Duplicate steps in the character encoding algorithm (W3C spec version only)
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- Re: Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- Netflix claims that EME is a W3C specification
- [Bug 21711] New: Unclear statement regarding inclusion of newlines in <pre> and <textarea>
- [Bug 21709] New: Duplicate entries in obsolete permitted DOCTYPE table
Friday, 12 April 2013
Thursday, 11 April 2013
Tuesday, 9 April 2013
Monday, 8 April 2013
- [Bug 21627] New: texttrackcue API change
- [Bug 21623] New: 7.5.2 The accesskey attribute: Comment regarding its usage on "All" HTML elements
Thursday, 4 April 2013
- Re: CfC: to publish a heartbeat Media Source Extensions Working Draft
- RE: CfC: to publish a heartbeat Media Source Extensions Working Draft
- RE: CfC: to publish a heartbeat Encrypted Media Extensions Working Draft
- Re: CfC: to publish a heartbeat Media Source Extensions Working Draft
- RE: Registration is open for April face-to-face meeting for HTML WG
- RE: to publish a heartbeat Media Source Extensions Working Draft
- Re: plan for removing hgroup from spec
- RE: plan for removing hgroup from spec
- [Bug 21579] New: Empty @alt should not imply role="presentation" if the <img> has @usemap
- Re: plan for removing hgroup from spec
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
- [Bug 21571] New: The sub-sentence "but there are many resources available" etc.
- [Bug 21566] New: User agents must present longdesc through normal interfaces.
- [Bug 21565] New: Should it be an error to use @longdesc on presentational images? And/Or should it _affect_ the role of the image?
- [Bug 21564] New: Allow ATs/UAs to use heuristics to suppress presentation of erroneous or pointless longdescs
- [Bug 21563] New: remove hgroup for HTML spec
- [Bug 21561] New: the input type=image element's ismap attribute is missing from the spec
- {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2013-04-04: MSE CfC, hgroup decision, April F2F meeting
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
- WG Decision on request to drop hgroup from HTML5
- [Bug 21501] New: Advice to conformance checkers section