On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:18:50 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> >> While Cox supports the process of separating VTT specific APIs from the >>> more generic TextTrackCue API, we oppose certain changes that introduce >>> backward compatibilities, including: >>> >>> (1) the removal of the TextTrackCue constructor; >>> >> >> The previous TextTrackCue constructor was actually WebVTT-specific (it >> set all the WebVTT properties and "text" was parsed using WebVTT parsing >> rules). >> > > Thanks for that reminder. Indeed, I had posted a bug on this and suggested > an alternative approach in [1]. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21080 > I was thinking of this solution initially, too. But let's continue to have this discussion in the bugs and on the main mailing list. I have some feedback that I will post to the bug. Thanks for pointing out this bug and sorry for the delays to get to it. Regards, Silvia.
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 08:04:30 UTC