- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:08:36 +0200
- To: "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:03:31 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:18:50 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> >> wrote: >> >> While Cox supports the process of separating VTT specific APIs from the >>> more generic TextTrackCue API, we oppose certain changes that introduce >>> backward compatibilities, including: >>> >>> (1) the removal of the TextTrackCue constructor; >>> >> >> The previous TextTrackCue constructor was actually WebVTT-specific (it >> set >> all the WebVTT properties and "text" was parsed using WebVTT parsing >> rules). > > > Thanks for that reminder. Indeed, I had posted a bug on this and > suggested > an alternative approach in [1]. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21080 The approach suggested there would also be a backwards-incompatible change, FWIW. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 14:09:11 UTC