- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:03:31 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 14:04:19 UTC
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 06:18:50 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > While Cox supports the process of separating VTT specific APIs from the >> more generic TextTrackCue API, we oppose certain changes that introduce >> backward compatibilities, including: >> >> (1) the removal of the TextTrackCue constructor; >> > > The previous TextTrackCue constructor was actually WebVTT-specific (it set > all the WebVTT properties and "text" was parsed using WebVTT parsing rules). Thanks for that reminder. Indeed, I had posted a bug on this and suggested an alternative approach in [1]. [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21080
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 14:04:19 UTC