aisaac via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub
Andrea Perego
Andrea Perego via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? (#1271) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relate to the Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile (#244) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of locn:geometry (#1293) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Refer to Dublin Core Application Profile framework (#736) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Add 'Security and privacy' section to all the documents (#460) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace for profiles ontology (and other things?) (#503) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Invalid Turtle in Example 3 of "The Profiles Vocabulary" (#1302) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Revision to the versioning section (Sunday, 14 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Revision to the versioning section (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Annette Greiner
Annette Greiner via GitHub
Aymen-Charef via GitHub
Bob Coret via GitHub
Chavdar Ivanov via GitHub
Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker
init AG via GitHub
Ivo Velitchkov via GitHub
Jakub KlĂmek via GitHub
Karen Coyle
Karen Coyle via GitHub
Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
Ludger A. Rinsche via GitHub
makxdekkers via GitHub
Peter Winstanley
pwin via GitHub
Renato Iannella via GitHub
Riccardo Albertoni
Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub
- [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Fix range of locn:geometry (#1303) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix issue 1293 in rdf (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Sunday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 12 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat dataseries issue1272 (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat dataseries issue1272 (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT for particular Resources/CKAN catalog (#1286) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] (#87) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Rob Atkinson via GitHub
Simon Cox via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: Dataset size characteristics (#161) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile) (#225) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile) (#225) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 16 February)
Siri Jodha S Khalsa via GitHub
ssstolk via GitHub
Susheel Varma via GitHub
Last message date: Sunday, 28 February 2021 19:43:04 UTC