W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > February 2021

public-dxwg-wg@w3.org from February 2021 by author

aisaac via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Wednesday, 17 February)
Andrea Perego
- Re: DCAT meeting : 23 Feb 2021 (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 03 Feb 2021 21:00 UTC (Wednesday, 3 February)
Andrea Perego via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Including more machine-actionable Version Delta? (#1271) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relate to the Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile (#244) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Issue with OWL compatibility properties? (#1305) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Range of locn:geometry (#1293) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix range of locn:geometry (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT define a property for version identifiers? (#1280) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Should DCAT adopt of specific definition of versioning? (#1277) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Saturday, 20 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Refer to Dublin Core Application Profile framework (#736) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Add 'Security and privacy' section to all the documents (#460) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Namespace for profiles ontology (and other things?) (#503) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Invalid Turtle in Example 3 of "The Profiles Vocabulary" (#1302) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Thursday, 18 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 16 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Revision to the versioning section (Sunday, 14 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Revision to the versioning section (Saturday, 13 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Annette Greiner
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
Annette Greiner via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Friday, 5 February)
Aymen-Charef via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT for particular Resources/CKAN catalog (#1286) (Thursday, 4 February)
Bob Coret via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Chavdar Ivanov via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 16 February)
Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker
- dxwg-ACTION-438: Prepare a new version of the versioning section (Wednesday, 3 February)
init AG via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Monday, 22 February)
- [dxwg] Range of locn:geometry (#1293) (Wednesday, 10 February)
Ivo Velitchkov via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 12 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 12 February)
Jakub Klímek via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 12 February)
- [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 12 February)
Karen Coyle
- Found my list (Tuesday, 23 February)
Karen Coyle via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291) (Thursday, 4 February)
Lars G. Svensson via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Add text to clarify that profile URIs don't have to resolve (#1000) (Monday, 22 February)
Ludger A. Rinsche via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Thursday, 25 February)
makxdekkers via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
Peter Winstanley
- DCAT meeting : 23 Feb 2021 (Monday, 22 February)
- Plenary Meeting - 9 February 2021 (Monday, 8 February)
pwin via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291) (Thursday, 4 February)
Renato Iannella via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Thursday, 25 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Describing the "Release Type" (#1289) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Sunday, 21 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Dataset to Catalog association (#1288) (Saturday, 20 February)
Riccardo Albertoni
- DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 17 Feb 2021 21:00 UTC (Tuesday, 16 February)
- DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference 03 Feb 2021 21:00 UTC (Monday, 1 February)
Riccardo Albertoni via GitHub
- [dxwg] Any other properties to mention in class dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1308) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [dxwg] Should we specialize dct:hasPart for dcat:DatasetSeries? (#1307) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Fix range of locn:geometry (#1303) (Sunday, 28 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Fix issue 1293 in rdf (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Notes on reviewing DCAT FPWD (#1275) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Backward (in)compatibility among versions. (#1258) (Saturday, 27 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Monday, 22 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 19 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Sunday, 14 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Editorial issue: change UML diagrams to SVG (#1294) (Friday, 12 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat dataseries issue1272 (Tuesday, 9 February)
- [dxwg] Pull Request: Dcat dataseries issue1272 (Tuesday, 9 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT for particular Resources/CKAN catalog (#1286) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Related vocabularies comparision [RVC] (#87) (Wednesday, 3 February)
Rob Atkinson via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Friday, 5 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Improve discovery of datacatalogs by registering well-known suffix 'datacatalog' (#1290) (Thursday, 4 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291) (Thursday, 4 February)
Simon Cox via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Sunday, 28 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Friday, 26 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Must a DCAT profile validate against all of DCAT? (#430) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Relation to real world entities (#168) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Use case: Dataset size characteristics (#161) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - ISO 19115 alignment (profile) (#151) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] Project context [RPCX] (#71) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Closed: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile) (#225) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT - CERIF alignment (profile) (#225) (Wednesday, 24 February)
- Re: [dxwg] "Current" vs "last" versions (#1304) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] Revision to the versioning section (#1295) (Tuesday, 16 February)
Siri Jodha S Khalsa via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
- Re: [dxwg] A separate class for DatasetSeries (?) (#1272) (Tuesday, 23 February)
ssstolk via GitHub
- [dxwg] Invalid Turtle in Example 3 of "The Profiles Vocabulary" (#1302) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dxwg] Resource URLs prohibit the use of QSA in data aggregators and/or single page web applications (#1301) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dxwg] Example 10 contains flawed Turtle (#1300) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dxwg] URIs in figure 2 could be turned into links to increase clarity (#1299) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dxwg] Example 5 uses no angle brackets in Content-Profile (#1298) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dxwg] Example 4 indicates JSON should be expected, but HTML is provided (#1297) (Wednesday, 17 February)
- [dxwg] Introduction repeats possible alternative implementations (#1296) (Wednesday, 17 February)
Susheel Varma via GitHub
- Re: [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for controlled-access healthcare datasets (#1291) (Saturday, 6 February)
- [dxwg] Advice on creating DCAT Profiles for health dataset that are not directly accessible (#1291) (Thursday, 4 February)